From seal period disclosures to trial—prepare exhibits for False Claims Act cases on both sides.
Stamp and organize qui tam exhibits for False Claims Act litigation, whistleblower cases, and FCA defense. Batch stamp hundreds of documents.
Try It Free →The Government Declined to Intervene, But the Case Continues...
Relator has 10 years of internal documents
Government production adds thousands more
Statistical sampling requires expert organization
Trial involves multiple theories of liability
ExhibitPrep helps qui tam counsel organize complex FCA cases from investigation through trial.
Case Types We Handle
Healthcare FCA
- Claims data
- Medical records samples
- Compliance documentation
- Relator statements
Typical volume: 300-1,000+ exhibits
Government Contracts FCA
- Contract documents
- Performance records
- Invoice samples
- Inspection reports
Typical volume: 200-600+ exhibits
Customs/Import FCA
- Import records
- Customs declarations
- Valuation documents
- Classification records
Typical volume: 150-500 exhibits
Grant Fraud
- Grant applications
- Progress reports
- Expenditure records
- Audit findings
Typical volume: 100-400 exhibits
Your Workflow: 4 Simple Steps
Upload Case Materials
Import relator documents, claims samples, and government productions.
Pro tip: Organize by theory of liability (reverse false claims, implied certification, etc.).
Organize by FCA Element
Arrange exhibits to prove falsity, scienter, and materiality.
Pro tip: For defense, group compliance evidence and good faith documentation.
Apply Clear Numbering
Stamp with party-appropriate exhibit designations.
Pro tip: Relator exhibits often use "R-" or "REL-" prefix; defendants use "D-".
Export for Litigation
Create organized binders for depositions and trial.
Pro tip: Prepare separate damages and liability exhibit sets if trial is bifurcated.
Your exhibits, ready in minutes.
Documents We Handle
Relator Materials
Internal documents, communications, and disclosure statements
Claims Evidence
False claims samples, statistical analyses, and damages calculations
Government Records
Audit reports, investigation materials, and agency correspondence
Compliance Documentation
Policies, procedures, and remediation evidence (defense)
What Qui Tam Exhibit Prep Actually Costs
| Approach | Software Cost | Time per Case | Labor Cost* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual Preparation | — | 4-6 hours | $300-450 |
| Adobe Acrobat Pro | $240/year | 2-3 hours | $150-225 |
| ExhibitPrep | $14.99 day pass | 25 minutes | $31 |
Save $300+ on every case.
More time for case strategy, less time on document formatting.
Professional Exhibit Organization Matters
Judges, arbitrators, and opposing counsel notice when exhibits are well-organized. It signals thorough case preparation and makes your evidence easier to follow during proceedings.
- Clear organization demonstrates case preparedness
- Easy navigation helps decision-makers find key evidence
- Professional presentation supports credibility
100% Local Processing
ExhibitPrep processes all documents locally in your browser. Your qui tam case files never leave your computer or get uploaded to any external server.
- Privileged documents stay on your device
- Client confidentiality maintained
- No data retention or cloud storage
See Qui Tam / False Claims Exhibit Stamping in Action
Watch how to prepare court-ready qui tam exhibits in under 30 seconds.
Questions About Qui Tam / False Claims Exhibits
How do qui tam relators organize exhibits for healthcare False Claims Act cases?
Healthcare FCA exhibits organize by the three elements of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1): (1) falsity exhibits (sample claims showing upcoding, unbundling, or lack of medical necessity numbered Relator Ex. 1-200), (2) scienter exhibits (internal compliance warnings ignored, billing training materials, emails showing knowledge numbered REL-201 through REL-400), and (3) materiality exhibits (showing CMS would not have paid claims if truth known, numbered REL-401 onwards). Create separate sections for statistical sampling (50-200 sample claims), extrapolation methodology, and treble damages calculations. Healthcare qui tam cases typically involve 300-1,000 total exhibits spanning 5-10 years of alleged false billing.
Can qui tam counsel use statistical sampling and extrapolation in FCA exhibit sets?
Yes. Statistical sampling under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 allows relators to prove patterns from representative samples. Upload 50-200 sampled false claims as individual exhibits (REL-1 through REL-200), followed by statistician expert report explaining random sampling methodology (REL-201), confidence interval calculations (REL-202), and extrapolation to universe of claims (REL-203). Courts accept statistical sampling when: sample size exceeds 50 claims, selection is random, and confidence level reaches 95% per Daubert standards. This proves $10M+ in false claims from 100-claim sample.
How should FCA defendants organize compliance program exhibits for scienter defense?
False Claims Act scienter requires "knowing" submission of false claims under 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(1), allowing good faith compliance defense. Organize defense exhibits chronologically: (1) compliance policies adopted (Def. Ex. A-1 through A-25), (2) employee training records showing billing education (Ex. B-1 through B-50), (3) internal audits identifying and correcting billing errors (Ex. C-1 through C-75), (4) external consultant reviews (Ex. D-1 through D-30), and (5) self-disclosures to OIG or Medicare contractors (Ex. E-1 through E-20). Comprehensive compliance evidence can defeat reckless disregard standard, reducing treble damages to single damages under 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a).
What exhibit strategies work for qui tam relators when DOJ declines intervention?
When DOJ declines intervention under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(B), relators must proceed alone with tighter, more persuasive exhibits. Federal courts expect efficient presentation from relators whose cases government declined to join. Focus on 150-300 strongest exhibits: (1) smoking gun documents showing intentional fraud (internal emails, compliance warnings ignored), (2) statistically valid sampling proving pattern (50+ representative false claims), (3) relator firsthand knowledge exhibits (employment records, training materials received, job duties), and (4) government regulatory guidance showing defendants knew requirements. Declined cases settle 15-20% less than intervened cases—compelling exhibits are critical.
Does ExhibitPrep protect seal-period confidentiality for qui tam whistleblower materials?
Yes. Qui tam cases remain under seal for 60+ days while DOJ investigates per 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2). All processing occurs locally in your browser using client-side PDF manipulation—seal-period complaint, relator disclosure statement, confidential investigation documents, and whistleblower identity information never upload to external servers or leave your computer. Violating seal provisions can result in case dismissal and sanctions. ExhibitPrep maintains confidentiality required during 18-36 month seal periods while government decides whether to intervene.
Can qui tam relators prepare exhibit binders for DOJ and USAO investigation interviews?
Yes. Seal-period government interviews are critical—DOJ intervention decisions depend on relator presentation of evidence. Organize 100-200 exhibits for USAO meetings: (1) chronological overview binder showing fraud timeline, (2) key documents binder with smoking guns highlighted, (3) sample claims binder demonstrating billing patterns, (4) relator background exhibits proving firsthand knowledge, and (5) damages calculation exhibits. Well-organized presentations increase DOJ intervention rates by 30-40% compared to disorganized evidence. Government attorneys appreciate efficient exhibit organization during initial 2-3 hour relator interviews that determine case merit.
Your FCA Case, Organized
From seal period disclosure to trial. Preview free—pay only when you're ready to download.
Try It Free →